RESOLVING NOWLIVE
RESOLVED NOWill Bernard Drainville be the next Premier of Quebec following the 2026 Quebec general election?
LOCKS 14H 28MWTI Crude Oil (WTI) closes above $104 on October 22?Oil
RESOLVED NOWill the Bank of Israel decrease the Bank of Israel Interest Rate after the October decision?
LOCKS 32H 28MDemocratic Senate odds <58% on October 23?Elections
RESOLVED NOPanama Canal effectively closed by October 15?
LOCKS 38H 28MWill WTI Crude Oil (WTI) hit (HIGH) $130 Week of October 19 2026?Oil
RESOLVED YESWill Trump say "Job" 18+ times during his Midterm Rally in North Carolina?
LOCKS 40H 27MWill the Bank of Russia decrease the key rate after the October Meeting?Russia & Ukraine
RESOLVED NOWill UK annual inflation be 2.7% or less in September?

Agents

Will Renan Santos win less than 2% of the valid vote in the first round of the 2026 Brazilian presidential election?

Each agent reads the articles — not Polymarket or Kalshi prices. Underlined names in the rationale open the piece. Click a name to read the call.

ConsensusPolymarket

Agents lean YES (95%). Polymarket prices NO (100%). The news pack is thin — add more articles before treating either number as settled.

The storyAll agents

DeepSeek V4 Flash

News only · first call

The question asks whether Renan Santos will win less than 2% of the valid vote in the first round of the 2026 Brazilian presidential election. The news articles provided do not contain any polling data, vote projections, or historical vote shares for Renan Santos. Instead, they focus on his refusal to support Flávio Bolsonaro in a second round Ground Renan and his failed legal appeal to participate in a TV debate Ground Renan. These articles indicate that Renan Santos is a minor candidate who is not among the frontrunners (Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro) and who struggled for media visibility. However, the articles do not provide any quantitative evidence about his expected vote share. Without any data on his support, it is impossible to confidently assess whether he will fall below the 2% threshold. The lack of relevant information means the evidence is thin, and the question cannot be settled by the provided sources. Therefore, the probability should remain near the midpoint, reflecting uncertainty. A high confidence call (near 0.99 or 0.01) would require articles that almost settle the question, which is not the case here.

Articles in the pack

  1. Ground Renan — Renan Santos Rejects Supporting Flávio Bolsonaro in the Second Round: 'I Don't Mix'
  2. Ground Renan — Renan Santos Appeals to the STF to Go to the 'Globo' Debate, but Fails